Background: Iran’s Nuclear Deal Violations
Following the 2018 U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran began progressively violating the restrictions on its nuclear program. These breaches included enriching uranium to much higher levels, installing advanced centrifuges, and restricting access for IAEA inspectors. These actions raised deep concerns among the European powers (E3: UK, France, and Germany), who demanded the reimposition of UN sanctions through the “snapback mechanism” built into the deal.
South Korea’s Procedural Role
South Korea, as the rotating president of the UN Security Council, found itself in a crucial position. To formally trigger the snapback process, a draft resolution to continue sanctions relief for Iran had to be put forward. This was a technicality, as the resolution was designed to fail. South Korea drafted the resolution, thereby paving the way for the European powers to activate the snapback mechanism after its rejection.
The Anticipated Veto and Its Aftermath
As expected, the resolution is poised to be vetoed by Western powers, including the United States, the UK, and France. This deliberate rejection is not a failure but the necessary step to formally trigger the snapback mechanism. Once vetoed, all UN sanctions that were lifted under the nuclear deal will be automatically reimposed by the end of September. This will push Iran one step closer to complete diplomatic and economic isolation.
Conclusion: The Imminent Return of Sanctions
South Korea’s procedural move marks the final stage in a complex diplomatic process. With the vote and the inevitable veto approaching, the world is bracing for the return of the full international sanctions regime on Iran. This development is likely to lead to a significant escalation in tensions, forcing Tehran to confront the consequences of its nuclear transgressions on the global stage.
This page is also available in: 
فارسی 
Georgian (Georgia) 
עברית 
العربية