Background of the Snapback Mechanism
In response to European powers activating the snapback mechanism, a provision within the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran’s parliament has become an arena of deep division. The move by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom came as a reaction to Iran’s persistent breaches of the nuclear deal’s terms, which followed the United States’ unilateral withdrawal in 2018. The snapback is designed to re-impose all pre-2015 United Nations sanctions on Tehran.
A Power Struggle in Parliament
Facing this mounting international pressure, hardline lawmakers are pushing for a fast-tracked bill to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). They argue that the parliament, as the legislative body, holds the legal authority for such a move. This position directly contradicts statements from former officials and other parliamentarians who insist that such a critical strategic decision is the exclusive domain of the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, and the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC).
Implications of the Internal Fracture
The conflicting statements reveal a profound fracture in the Iranian establishment’s decision-making structure. This is not merely a legal debate but a symptom of a serious internal power struggle. Hardliners are leveraging the international crisis to assert their authority and challenge the traditional power centers. A withdrawal from the NPT would be a monumental step, effectively ending any pretense of a peaceful nuclear program and isolating Iran to an unprecedented degree, potentially leading to military conflict.
Conclusion
This disarray signals that external pressures have exacerbated internal factionalism in Tehran. The public clash over who holds ultimate authority on foreign and national security policy highlights a critical instability at the highest levels of the Iranian government amid a growing international crisis.
This page is also available in: 
فارسی 
Georgian (Georgia) 
עברית 
العربية